
doi: 10.31729/jnma.179
pmid: 19529051
INTRODUCTION:Inadequate dialysis accounts for the high mortality in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD). In Nepal, due to various factors including financial and logistic limitations, hemodialysis is mostly performed twice-a-week. This study was undertaken to look at adequacy of dialysis in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis in Nepal where the patients profile, in terms of diet, body muscle mass, nutritional status etc are different from western world.METHODS:In this cross sectional observational study, 40 patients on maintenance hemodialysis in the dialysis unit were evaluated and enrolled if patients were regularly undergoing twice-a-week hemodialysis in preceding 6 months with each session of dialysis prescription consisting of 4 hours (240 minutes). Patients were excluded if they were admitted in the hospital for some acute problems or had received acute hemodialysis in preceding 6 months. Only 14 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Hemodialysis adequacy was measured using well established urea kinetic modeling.RESULTS:The mean age of the patients was 49 +/- 24 years. Mean predialysis urea and post dialysis urea were 163.7 +/- 60.05 mg/dL, and 73.7 mg/dL +/- 30.55 respectively. Mean URR was 65.3%. Mean Kt/v as assessed by Jindals equation was 0.99.CONCLUSIONS:Our study showed that twice-a-week of maintenance hemodialysis did not achieve recommended adequacy of hemodialysis in our patients.Key words: Adequacy of dialysis, end stage renal disease, hemodialysis.
Adult, Male, Medicine (General), Pilot Projects, Middle Aged, Kidney Function Tests, R5-920, Cross-Sectional Studies, Nepal, Renal Dialysis, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Female
Adult, Male, Medicine (General), Pilot Projects, Middle Aged, Kidney Function Tests, R5-920, Cross-Sectional Studies, Nepal, Renal Dialysis, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Female
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
