Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Neurilemomas of the trigeminal nerves

Authors: Peter J. Jannetta; Laligam N. Sekhar; Ian F. Pollack; Ivo P. Janecka;

Neurilemomas of the trigeminal nerves

Abstract

✓ Sixteen patients with trigeminal neurilemoma have been treated at the University Health Center of Pittsburgh during the last 15 years. Two patients had middle fossa tumors arising from the trigeminal ganglion, four had posterior fossa tumors arising from the trigeminal roots, six had “hourglass” lesions extending above and below the tentorium and involving the trigeminal ganglion and its roots, and four had tumors arising from the trigeminal branches and extending through the superior orbital fissure, foramen rotundum, or foramen ovale. In seven patients, tumor had also invaded the cavernous sinus. The clinical and radiographic features of these tumors, the operative approaches employed, and the postoperative outcome are discussed. Complete tumor excision was achieved in 12 patients; all 12 remain free of recurrence 3 to 157 months after surgery. In contrast, all four patients who underwent subtotal tumor excision showed progressive neurological deterioration from regrowth of residual tumor within 3 years of the initial surgery. Two of these four subsequently had total tumor excision and both are disease-free 23 and 34 months after the second procedure. Major morbidity developed in only one of the 16 patients. There were no operative deaths. Nine patients had preserved or improved trigeminal function after treatment.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Radiography, Reoperation, Postoperative Complications, Nerve Degeneration, Humans, Cranial Nerve Neoplasms, Postoperative Period, Trigeminal Nerve, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Neurilemmoma

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    168
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
168
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?