
pmid: 15323469
Object In this study the authors retrospectively review outcomes in patients treated for metastases to the spine. Surgery for metastatic tumors to the spine remains an important part of the treatment armamentarium. Maximum tumor resection with a minimum number of complications is one of the goals of surgery. Current surgical procedures include tumor resection and spinal stabilization for optimal results. Methods The records of 96 patients who underwent surgery for a metastatic spine tumor at the authors' institution were reviewed. Spinal instrumentation was used in the majority of patients. Ambulatory status was maintained in 91% and pain improved in 94% of patients. Complications included infection (5.2%), cerebrospinal fluid leak (2%), and delayed hardware failure (3.1%). The mortality rate was 4.1%; the main cause was due to tumor progression. Conclusions Surgery is indicated in a select group of patients with metastatic tumors to the spine. A multidisciplinary approach is recommended for patient selection and complication avoidance. Surgical options, including approach, type of reconstruction and extent of resection (including en bloc spondylectomy) need to be addressed for optimal outcomes.
Adult, Male, Patient Care Team, Adolescent, Rectal Neoplasms, Bone Screws, Palliative Care, Prostheses and Implants, Adenocarcinoma, Middle Aged, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Internal Fixators, Fatal Outcome, Humans, Female, Interdisciplinary Communication, Orthopedic Procedures, Child, Aged, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Male, Patient Care Team, Adolescent, Rectal Neoplasms, Bone Screws, Palliative Care, Prostheses and Implants, Adenocarcinoma, Middle Aged, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Internal Fixators, Fatal Outcome, Humans, Female, Interdisciplinary Communication, Orthopedic Procedures, Child, Aged, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 82 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
