Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Transportation Resea...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Fatigue-Transfer Functions: How Do They Compare?

Authors: Terhi K. Pellinen; Donald W. Christensen; Geoffrey M. Rowe; Mark Sharrock;

Fatigue-Transfer Functions: How Do They Compare?

Abstract

The primary objective of this work was to investigate which of several fatigue-transfer functions predict the failure of mixtures and expected fatigue life most accurately. A second objective was to study existing fatigue models and how they relate to mixture volumetrics. This work was done by employing layered elastic analysis to obtain stresses and strains in the pavement under monthly temperature variations. The calculated tensile strains were then used in the fatigue-transfer functions to predict the fatigue life of the pavement. The mix and distress data were obtained from the WesTrack project. In general, all fatigue-model predictions were poor to fair; even the locally calibrated models (WesTrack) yielded at best 57% accuracy in predicting failing or surviving mixtures. The Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP) model predicted failures with 72% accuracy; the Asphalt Institute model, 39%; Medani and Molenaar's model, 31%; and the Shell models, 28% accuracy. The SHRP and Asphalt Institute models used suggested field shift factors (FSFs). The fatigue models studied were originally developed for predicting crack initiation in the laboratory. In using these models to predict fatigue life in actual pavements, crack propagation is usually addressed through an empirically determined FSF. An attempt was made to calibrate and recalibrate the fatigue-transfer models using the WesTrack data. This analysis indicates that there is a trade-off in predicting failing or surviving mixtures correctly and the accuracy of the predicting fatigue life compared with the applied traffic loading. Because the nonfailed mixtures were trafficked with only 5 million traffic repetitions, the error associated with the fatigue-life predictions was unknown. Therefore, the overall improvement of the model accuracy through this calibration process cannot be assessed. For several reasons, this study recommends using the Asphalt Institute fatigue-transfer equation in layered elastic analysis to evaluate the fatigue-cracking potential of asphalt mixtures.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    13
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
13
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!