
doi: 10.31337/oz.75.4.1
Autor u ovom članku uspoređuje kritičku teoriju međunarodnih odnosa Andrewa Linklatera i neorealizam Kennetha Waltza. Taj je odnos analiziran u prvom redu pod vidom etike, a u manjem dijelu se osvrće i na različitost pristupa međunarodnim problemima. Budući da Linklater u nekoliko navrata napominje da je kritička teorija međunarodnih odnosa superiorna strukturalnomu realizmu ili neorealizmu, autor ovoga članka nastoji otkriti ima li opravdanih razloga za takvu tvrdnju.
neorealism, politička zajednica, political community, kritička međunarodna teorija ; neorealizam ; etika ; politička zajednica ; emancipacija, ethics, neorealizam, etika, emancipacija, critical international theory, emancipation, kritička međunarodna teorija
neorealism, politička zajednica, political community, kritička međunarodna teorija ; neorealizam ; etika ; politička zajednica ; emancipacija, ethics, neorealizam, etika, emancipacija, critical international theory, emancipation, kritička međunarodna teorija
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
