
pmid: 22610763
Background Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become standard method for treating gallstone. However, different centres have reported different complications and conversion rate. The objective of this study was to evaluate complications and conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy into open cholecystectomy in Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University, Nepal. Methods Files of all patients who had laparoscopic cholecystectomy from January 2005 to December 2009 were reviewed. Out of 119 laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases, 102 were included in the study as complete information was lacking in the rest. Results Out of 102 cases, 80 were female. Symptomatic cholelithiasis were 76.47%. The mean hospital stay was 2.48 days. Postoperative complications occured in 5.88% patients. Conversion rate to open cholecystectomy was 3.92%. Conclusions Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a reliable and safe surgery. With growing experience in laparoscopic technique, it is possible to bring complications and conversion rate to minimum. However, there will be no significant improvements once learning curve is reached. Rather, the nature of biliary injury may become more severe.http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/kumj.v8i4.6232 Kathmandu Univ Med J 2010;8(4):367-9
Adult, Male, Laparotomy, Adolescent, Incidence, Middle Aged, Hospitals, University, Young Adult, Postoperative Complications, Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic, Nepal, Cholelithiasis, Humans, Cholecystectomy, Female, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Male, Laparotomy, Adolescent, Incidence, Middle Aged, Hospitals, University, Young Adult, Postoperative Complications, Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic, Nepal, Cholelithiasis, Humans, Cholecystectomy, Female, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
