Common Concerns with MTurk as a Participant Pool: Evidence and Solutions

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Part of book or chapter of book , Preprint 01 Sep 2018 Netherlands Publisher:Center for Open Science

Authors: David Hauser; Gabriele Paolacci; Jesse J. Chandler;

doi: 10.31234/osf.io/uq45c

Common Concerns with MTurk as a Participant Pool: Evidence and Solutions

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

In this chapter, we outline the common concerns with MTurk as a participant pool, review the evidence for those concerns, and discuss solutions. We close with a Table of considerations that researchers should make when fielding a study on MTurk

Country

Netherlands

Related Organizations

Erasmus University Rotterdam
Netherlands
College of New Jersey
United States

Keywords

PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, Social and Behavioral Sciences

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	51
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 1%