
People can quickly and accurately compute not only the mean size of a set of items but also the size variability of the items. However, it remains unknown how these statistics are estimated. Here we show that neither parallel access to all items nor random subsampling of just a few items is sufficient to explain participants' estimations of size variability. In three experiments, we had participants compare two arrays of circles with different variability in their sizes. In the first 2 experiments, we manipulated the congruency of the range and variance of the arrays. The arrays with congruent range and variability information were judged more accurately, indicating the use of range as a proxy for variability. Experiments 2B and 3 showed that people also are not invariant to low- or mid-level visual information in the arrays, as comparing arrays with different low-level characteristics (filled vs. outlined circles) led to systematic biases. Together, these experiments indicate that range and low- or mid-level properties are both utilized as proxies for variability discrimination, and people are flexible in adopting these strategies. These strategies are at odds with the claim of parallel extraction of ensemble statistics per se and random subsampling strategies previously proposed in the literature.
PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Motion Perception, Male, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Problem Solving, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Vision, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Touch, Taste, and Smell, Medical and Health Sciences, Discrimination, Psychological, Theoretical, Models, Discrimination, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Audition, Psychology, Heuristics, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Biases, Framing, and Heuristics, Experimental Psychology, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology, Visual Perception, Female, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Picture Processing, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Vestibular Systems and Proprioception, Set, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Learning, Adult, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Consciousness, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Cognition and Perception, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Embodied Cognition, Article, Young Adult, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Creativity, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Reasoning, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Judgment and Decision Making, Humans, Analysis of Variance, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Perceptual Organization, statistical summary representations, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Attention, Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Memory, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Concepts and Categories, Models, Theoretical, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Imagery, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Cognitive Psychology, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Language, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, variability discrimination, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Multisensory Integration, Set, Psychology, Psychological, range heuristic, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Action
PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Motion Perception, Male, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Problem Solving, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Vision, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Touch, Taste, and Smell, Medical and Health Sciences, Discrimination, Psychological, Theoretical, Models, Discrimination, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Audition, Psychology, Heuristics, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Biases, Framing, and Heuristics, Experimental Psychology, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology, Visual Perception, Female, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Picture Processing, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Vestibular Systems and Proprioception, Set, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Learning, Adult, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Consciousness, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Cognition and Perception, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Embodied Cognition, Article, Young Adult, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Creativity, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Reasoning, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Judgment and Decision Making, Humans, Analysis of Variance, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Perceptual Organization, statistical summary representations, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Attention, Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Memory, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Concepts and Categories, Models, Theoretical, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Imagery, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Cognitive Psychology, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Language, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, variability discrimination, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Multisensory Integration, Set, Psychology, Psychological, range heuristic, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Action
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
