
Jef Ausloos, René Mahieu and Michael Veale, ‘Getting Data Subject Rights Right: A Submission to the European Data Protection Board from International Data Rights Academics, to Inform Regulatory Guidance’ (2019) 10 JIPITEC 283.We are a group of academics active in research and practice around data rights. We believe that the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) guidance on data rights currently under construction is an important point to resolve a variety of tensions and grey areas which, if left unaddressed, may significantly undermine the fundamental right to data protection. All of us were present at the recent stakeholder event on data rights in Brussels on 4 November 2019, and it is in the context and spirit of stakeholder engagement that we have created this document to explore and provide recommendations and examples in this area. This document is based on comprehensive empirical evidence as well as CJEU case law, EDPB (and, previously, Article 29 Working Party) guidance and extensive scientific research into the scope, rationale, effects and general modalities of data rights.
bepress|Law|Science and Technology Law, bepress|Law|Computer Law, bepress|Law|Human Rights Law, LawArXiv|Law, bepress|Law|Privacy Law, LawArXiv|Law|Science and Technology Law, LawArXiv|Law|Computer Law, LawArXiv|Law|Human Rights Law, bepress|Law, LawArXiv|Law|Privacy Law
bepress|Law|Science and Technology Law, bepress|Law|Computer Law, bepress|Law|Human Rights Law, LawArXiv|Law, bepress|Law|Privacy Law, LawArXiv|Law|Science and Technology Law, LawArXiv|Law|Computer Law, LawArXiv|Law|Human Rights Law, bepress|Law, LawArXiv|Law|Privacy Law
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
