Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ OSF Preprintsarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.i...
Article . 2019 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Geotechnical Engineering

Authors: Abd Rahim;

Geotechnical Engineering

Abstract

Geotechnical analysis below the surface of hydropower plant is one way to determine the stability of the opening holes in determining the supporting system. A discussion about supporting systems cannot be separated from the analysis of the construction of recommended supporting system based on the weighting value of the geomechanical classification of the RMR and Q-System. The aims of this study are: 1) understanding the quality and class types of rock, 2) determining the supporting of RMR and Q-system, 3) understanding the safety factor of opening hole using Phase2. This study was carried out by recording data directly in the field, which later were used to determine the number of rock bolt needed in the installation of the supporting. Based on geomechanical classification, the rock mass in headrace tunnel adit 1 up stream has an average RMR value of 58 (moderate rock quality) and Q-system value of 4.06 (moderate rock quality), while adit 2 up stream has an average RMR value of 47 (moderate rock quality) and Q-system value of 2.30 (poor rock quality). Based on these geomechanical classification data, each type of supporting types is obtained. Supporting headrace tunnel adit 1 and 2 type, RMR value of type 1 can be applied to the RMR (60-80). RMR value of type 2 can be applied to the RMR (40-60). Supporting headrace tunnel adit 1 and 2 type, Q-system value of type 1 can be applied to Q-value (4-10). Q-system value can be applied to Q-value (1-4). Based on the modeling results using phase2, the total displacement of headrace tunnel adit 1 up stream is 0.92 cm with safety factor value of 1.20 and the total displacement of headrace tunnel adit 2 up stream is 1.17 cm with safety factor value of 1.04.

Keywords

Engineering, Mining Engineering

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
hybrid
Related to Research communities