
doi: 10.31224/5334
In the real world, many reversal phenomena occur, such as statements once considered false later becoming recognized as true. Upside-Down Logic provides a framework to formalize such reversals by inverting truth and falsity through contextual transformations, thus capturing ambiguity and dynamic changes in reasoning processes. A Plithogenic Set models elements via attribute-based membership and contradiction functions, extending the established frameworks of fuzzy, intuitionistic, and neutrosophic sets. De-Plithogenication is the process of systematically neutralizing contradictions in plithogenic structures, resetting or transforming attribute relationships into consistent, contradiction-free states. A Plithogenic Neutrosophic Set further represents truth, indeterminacy, and falsity degrees under contradictions, enriching neutrosophic sets with context-sensitive semantics. In this paper, we define and study Three-Mode Upside-Down Logic, an improved version of Upside-Down Logic, together with De-Plithogenication, and investigate their behavior within the framework of Plithogenic Neutrosophic Sets.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
