
doi: 10.31224/4967
Uncertainty modeling underpins decision-making across diverse domains, and numerous frameworks—such as Fuzzy Sets [1, 2], Rough Sets [3, 4], Hesitant Fuzzy Sets [5, 6], and Plithogenic Sets [7, 8]—have been developed to capture different facets of imprecision. Hyperfuzzy Sets and their recursive generalization, SuperHyperfuzzy Sets, assign set-valued membership degrees at multiple hierarchical levels to represent uncertainty more richly [9]. The Linear Diophantine Fuzzy Set further refines this approach by imposing weighted linear Diophantine constraints on membership and non-membership grades [10–13]. In this paper, we define two new constructs—the Linear Diophantine Hyperfuzzy Set and the Linear Diophantine SuperHyperfuzzy Set—by integrating Diophantine constraints with hyperfuzzy and superhyperfuzzy frameworks, and we present a concise application example. These extensions offer a more structured, hierarchical means of applying Linear Diophantine Fuzzy Set methodology in practical uncertain environments.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
