Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ https://doi.org/10.3...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://doi.org/10.31224/4530...
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Master Work Function

A Scalar Potential for Hybrid Human–Machine Meaningful Work
Authors: Krishna Patel;

Master Work Function

Abstract

The rapid rise of automation and artificial intelligence (AI) has intensified the need for frameworks ensuring that technological progress aligns with human meaningful work and well-being. This paper introduces and rigorously expands upon the Master Work Function (MWF), a novel scalar potential function that quantifies “meaningful work” in hybrid human–machine systems. Drawing inspiration from physics, we formally define the MWF and derive its properties, including a connection to the Jarzynski equality from nonequilibrium thermodynamics for relating work and potential differences. We decompose the MWF into human, machine, and interaction sectors with bounded contributions, and analyze limiting cases (e.g., purely human or machine-driven work) and the interpretation of its gradients and Hessians as signals for optimal human–AI collaboration. Building on socio–technical insights, we formalize the MWF using contemporary mathematics, including scalar field theory, variational calculus, dynamic systems, game theory, and optimal control. We generalize the sectoral decomposition to multi–agent settings and embed the MWF into variational and control frameworks to analyze dynamic trajectories. Jarzynski’s equality is adapted using statistical mechanical arguments to bound the expected work expended during socio–technical transitions. Philosophically, we situate the MWF within phenomenology, critical theory, and justice frameworks, drawing on Rawls, Marx, Husserl, Foucault, and contemporary work on AI alignment and human–machine teaming. Applications are explored across engineering (human-centered design), robotics (human–robot teaming), AI and cyber-physical systems (value-aligned automation), education (AI-assisted teaching), economics (metrics for the future of work), and digital governance. Placeholder sections and tables are provided for empirical validation and simulation results. The paper argues that the MWF can serve as a unifying theoretical and practical tool to ensure that socio–technical systems respect human autonomy, dignity, and flourishing, while enabling efficient and ethically aligned automation.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
hybrid