
arXiv: 2103.05019
There is much confusion in the literature over Hurst exponent (H). The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the difference between fractional Brownian motion (fBm) on the one hand and Gaussian Markov processes where H is different to 1/2 on the other. The difference lies in the increments, which are stationary and correlated in one case and nonstationary and uncorrelated in the other. The two- and one-point densities of fBm are constructed explicitly. The two-point density does not scale. The one-point density for a semi-infinite time interval is identical to that for a scaling Gaussian Markov process with H different to 1/2 over a finite time interval. We conclude that both Hurst exponents and one-point densities are inadequate for deducing the underlying dynamics from empirical data. We apply these conclusions in the end to make a focused statement about nonlinear diffusion.
Signal Processing (eess.SP), FOS: Computer and information sciences, F.2.1; G.2.0, Discrete Mathematics (cs.DM), 68Q11 (Primary), 94A12 (Secondary), FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, G.2.0, F.2.1, Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Signal Processing, Computer Science - Discrete Mathematics
Signal Processing (eess.SP), FOS: Computer and information sciences, F.2.1; G.2.0, Discrete Mathematics (cs.DM), 68Q11 (Primary), 94A12 (Secondary), FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, G.2.0, F.2.1, Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Signal Processing, Computer Science - Discrete Mathematics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
