
Digital well-being concerns individuals’ subjective well-being in a social environment where digital media are omnipresent. A general framework is developed to integrate empirical research toward a cumulative science of the impacts of digital media use on well-being. It describes the nature of and connections between three pivotal constructs: digital practices, harms/benefits, and well-being. Individual’s digital practices arise within and shape socio-technical structural conditions, and lead to often concomitant harms and benefits. These pathways are theoretically plausible causal chains that lead from a specific manifestation of digital practice to an individual well-being-related outcome with some regularity. Future digital well-being studies should prioritize descriptive validity and formal theory development.
media effects, smartphone use, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 070 News media, journalism & publishing, 10240 Department of Communication and Media Research, Sociology, 3312 Sociology and Political Science, being, framework, well-being, Psychology, social media use, digital inequality, 070 News media, journalism & publishing, well, Communication, Communication theory, research design, digital well-being, digital well, digitization, Communication Technology and New Media, Social Media, 3315 Communication
media effects, smartphone use, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 070 News media, journalism & publishing, 10240 Department of Communication and Media Research, Sociology, 3312 Sociology and Political Science, being, framework, well-being, Psychology, social media use, digital inequality, 070 News media, journalism & publishing, well, Communication, Communication theory, research design, digital well-being, digital well, digitization, Communication Technology and New Media, Social Media, 3315 Communication
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 174 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
