
A recent paper (Fotheringham et al. 2017) expands the well-known Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) framework significantly by allowing the bandwidth or smoothing factor in GWR to be derived separately for each covariate in the model – a framework referred to as Multiscale GWR (MGWR). However, one limitation of the MGWR framework is that, until now, no inference about the local parameter estimates was possible. Formally, the so-called “hat matrix,” which projects the observed response vector into the predicted response vector, was available in GWR but not in MGWR. This paper addresses this limitation by reframing GWR as a Generalized Additive Model (GAM), extending this framework to MGWR and then deriving standard errors for the local parameters in MGWR. In addition, we also demonstrate how the effective number of parameters (ENP) can be obtained for the overall fit of an MGWR model and for each of the covariates within the model. This statistic is essential for comparing model fit between MGWR, GWR, and traditional global models, as well as adjusting for multiple hypothesis tests. We demonstrate these advances to the MGWR framework with both a simulated data set and a real-world data set.
Statistics and Probability, 330, Geography, Statistical Models, Multivariate Analysis, Physical Sciences and Mathematics, Geographic Information Sciences, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Spatial Science
Statistics and Probability, 330, Geography, Statistical Models, Multivariate Analysis, Physical Sciences and Mathematics, Geographic Information Sciences, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Spatial Science
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 362 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
