
In a proposal, Vijay-Shanker and Joshi presented a definition for combining the two formalisms Tree Adjoining Grammars and PATR unification. The essential idea for that combination is the separation of the two recursion operations - adjoining and unification - to preserve all properties of both formalisms which is not desirable for natural language applications. In this paper, a definition for the integrated use of both processes is given and the remaining properties of the resulting formalism are discussed - especially weighing the appropriateness of this definition for natural language processing.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
