
1.1. The emergence of materially elaborated variants of generative description of languages has brought about a pragmatical question as to whether a particular generative grammar is working in such a way as it is assumed to be. This problem proved to be unsolvable by a linguist not aided by computer. Therefore, programmes started to be written, so as to enable the computers either a) to make a grammar work or b) to allow to find out through a recognition procedure, e.g. changing the directions of arrows in all the rewriting rules whether an initial S can really be reached when starting from assumed output strings.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
