
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>In this paper, we propose a linear model-based general framework to combine k-best parse outputs from multiple parsers. The proposed framework leverages on the strengths of previous system combination and re-ranking techniques in parsing by integrating them into a linear model. As a result, it is able to fully utilize both the logarithm of the probability of each k-best parse tree from each individual parser and any additional useful features. For feature weight tuning, we compare the simulated-annealing algorithm and the perceptron algorithm. Our experiments are carried out on both the Chinese and English Penn Treebank syntactic parsing task by combining two state-of-the-art parsing models, a head-driven lexicalized model and a latent-annotation-based un-lexicalized model. Experimental results show that our F-Scores of 85.45 on Chinese and 92.62 on English outperform the previously best-reported systems by 1.21 and 0.52, respectively.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
