
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>pmid: 9689239
Geschwind, Behan and Galaburda have presented empirical research which indicates an association between left-handedness, immune disorders, and learning difficulties. Moreover, they have presented an hypothesis that purports to explain these associations, i.e. the 'testosterone hypothesis'. This article seeks to show that their hypothesis cannot explain: (a) which types and degrees of the conditions will appear, (b) why these conditions appear more often in males than in females, and (c) why these conditions seem to run in families. Moreover, this article attempts to show (d) that the hypothesis does not make clear the distinction between genetic and environmental factors, and that environmental factors are of greater importance. In addition, the hypothesis leads to great importance being given to purely random factors, because random factors alone determine whether or not a person with hemispherical symmetry will develop abnormal dominance Furthermore, this article argues that an hypothesis of this type should be based on a clear dividing line between latent and manifest symptoms, particularly when these are used to define research samples. Finally, (e) this article seeks to raise doubt as to the possible verification or falsification of the hypothesis by means of empirical studies.
Male, Brain, Environment, Functional Laterality, Dyslexia, Sex Factors, Immune System Diseases, Humans, Female, Testosterone, Language
Male, Brain, Environment, Functional Laterality, Dyslexia, Sex Factors, Immune System Diseases, Humans, Female, Testosterone, Language
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
