Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Postoperative Median Sternotomy Dehiscence

Authors: Ari Harjula; A. Järvinen;

Postoperative Median Sternotomy Dehiscence

Abstract

An analysis of the records of 2130 patients who consecutively underwent median sternotomy with or without cardiopulmonary bypass showed that sternal insufficiency necessitating refixation of the sternal plates developed in 12 patients (0.56%). This complication arose during the initial hospital stay in 11 patients, but in one patient the sternal instability appeared about a year after the operation. Re-exploration showed interruption of the stainless steel wires in six cases. In the other cases the wires had loosened, or knots had opened, or wires had cut through the sternal bone. All 12 patients had undergone open-heart surgery. The commonest risk factors for sternotomy dehiscence were excessive blood loss with heavy transfusion requirements, and postoperative wound infections. Other factors were respiratory complications and postoperative ventilatory support, low cardiac output syndrome, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and obesity. Careful closure of the sternum, using figure-of-eight sutures if necessary, and avoidance of excessive application of bone wax are important for preventing this harmful complication.

Keywords

Male, Reoperation, Risk, Sternum, Time Factors, Suture Techniques, Hemorrhage, Middle Aged, Staphylococcal Infections, Surgical Instruments, Surgical Wound Dehiscence, Humans, Surgical Wound Infection, Female, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    47
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
47
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!