Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Abdominal Wall Reconstruction

Authors: Larry P. Weinstein; Ted Chaglassian; Danica Kovachev;

Abdominal Wall Reconstruction

Abstract

Patients with abdominal wall reconstruction present a difficult management problem to the oncological surgeon. There were 36 patients treated for abdominal wall primary and secondary tumors between the years 1973 and 1982 at the Memorial Hospital. There were 25 abdominal wall sarcomas, 6 recurrent colon cancers, 2 recurrent bladder cancers, 1 cervical cancer, 1 recurrent endometrial cancer and 3 complications of radiotherapy treated by excision and reconstruction of the defect. The desmoid tumors were closed primarily. The recurrent sarcomas after radical excision, were reconstructed with Marlex mesh and local mobilization of skin and subcutaneous tissue. The recurrent colon bladder and endometrial cancers had been treated with over 5,000 cGy each. Three patients had significant full thickness skin loss secondary to radiotherapy. These patients comprised the group that required a myocutaneous flap to provide full thickness skin and fascia. The tensor fascia lata flap was used in eight patients. This group of patients did extremely well in contrast to the group of radiated patients with Marlex mesh reconstruction. There were less complications in the TFL group. We recommended the TFL flap for a large abdominal wall defect and for a previously radiated abdominal wall.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Adolescent, Sarcoma, Fibroma, Middle Aged, Surgical Mesh, Surgical Flaps, Child, Preschool, Neoplasms, Humans, Female, Surgery, Plastic, Child, Abdominal Muscles, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    22
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
22
Average
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!