<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 1313750
Two different measures of response to therapy were evaluated in a model of keratitis caused by Aspergillus fumigatus in Dutch-belted rabbits. Combined pre and post-inoculation treatment with oral fluconazole 37.5 mg/kg bid or itraconazole 40 mg/kg bid was compared to post-inoculation treatment only and untreated controls using a standardized clinical disease severity score and quantitative isolate recovery techniques. For both drugs, there was no difference in isolate recovery rates among all three groups. However, a significant improvement in clinical disease was noted in the pre and post-inoculation treatment group compared to controls (p less than .01) and to the post-inoculation group (p less than .05) for fluconazole. A similar trend, though not statistically significant, was apparent with itraconazole treatment. This disparity highlights the difficulties associated with measuring responses to therapy in keratomycosis and emphasizes the need for more sensitive and specific measures.
Keratitis, Observer Variation, Antifungal Agents, Aspergillus fumigatus, Colony Count, Microbial, Administration, Oral, Disease Models, Animal, Ketoconazole, Animals, Aspergillosis, Rabbits, Itraconazole, Eye Infections, Fungal, Fluconazole
Keratitis, Observer Variation, Antifungal Agents, Aspergillus fumigatus, Colony Count, Microbial, Administration, Oral, Disease Models, Animal, Ketoconazole, Animals, Aspergillosis, Rabbits, Itraconazole, Eye Infections, Fungal, Fluconazole
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |