Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Treatment of Urinary Incontinence with an Implantable Prosthesis

Authors: Pekka Hellström; Matti Kontturi; T Tammela; Olavi Lukkarinen;

Treatment of Urinary Incontinence with an Implantable Prosthesis

Abstract

Experiences with various types of implantable urinary incontinence prostheses based on two principles, passive compression of the urethra (Kaufman) or artificial dynamic sphincter (Scott) are recounted. The series consists of 40 patients, 3 women and 37 men. The cause of incontinence was transurethral resection of the prostate or open prostatectomy in 29 cases, radical prostatectomy in 3 cases, neurogenic bladder in 7 cases and urethroplasty in 1 case. The success rate with the Kaufman prosthesis was 50% and that with the Scott artificial sphincter 91% with an average follow-up of 2 years. Mechanical complications or infection requiring surgical intervention occurred in 42% cases. Careful patient selection and meticulous surgical technique are essential. The artificial urinary sphincter (type AMS 800) appears to be the best treatment modality for urethral sphincter deficiency. In the selected cases the Kaufman prosthesis still has a place for the treatment of elderly men with poor cortical and manual control, making them incapable of managing the AMS 800 prosthesis.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Prostatectomy, Silicones, Prostheses and Implants, Middle Aged, Prosthesis Design, Urinary Incontinence, Urethra, Humans, Female

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!