
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>pmid: 7777806
Early experiences with laparoscopic fundoplication using the Rosetti technique are presented and compared with retrospective results from conventional fundoplication procedures.We have performed 70 consecutive laparoscopic procedures. Conversion to open surgery was done in seven cases because of anatomical reasons and in two because of peroperative progressive subcutaneous emphysema and CO2-retention. The complication rate was low. The range of postoperative hospital stay is 1-4 days for non-converted patients. Symptomatic follow-up has hitherto been performed in 41 patients with a follow-up time of 3-9 months. The follow-up results do not differ from those achieved in patients operated upon with the conventional open Nissen (n = 41) and Rosetti (n = 36) techniques. Pre- and postoperative control of 24 h pH and lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) in 19 laparoscopically treated patients showed normalization of LESP in all cases and postoperative 24 h pH < 4 ranging between 0 and 3%.Laparoscopic and reflux surgery is effective for the treatment of reflux esophagitis. Follow-up results compare well with open surgery.
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Manometry, Fundoplication, Length of Stay, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Humans, Female, Laparoscopy, Child, Esophagitis, Peptic, Aged, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Manometry, Fundoplication, Length of Stay, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Humans, Female, Laparoscopy, Child, Esophagitis, Peptic, Aged, Retrospective Studies
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
