Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Longitudinal study of hearing

Authors: Adrian Davis; Birgit Ostri; Agnete Parving;

Longitudinal study of hearing

Abstract

Our knowledge of the progression and aetiology of hearing impairments is mainly inferred from cross-sectional studies of populations or individual case studies of relatively rare conditions. Longitudinal studies of carefully stratified samples enable scientific analysis of these two aspects of the ageing auditory system and also provide much needed incidence data on the basis of which to plan comprehensive hearing services. This preliminary paper using data from two studies over relatively short periods (between 2-4.5 years in Great Britain (GB) and up to 8 years in Denmark (DK] confirms (a) that deterioration of hearing impairment appears to be continuous and gradual for the majority (up to 97% on a 2-year assessment) with a median of about 5-6 dB/decade, and (b) that for mid-frequency average hearing levels applied to the samples of average age 55 (range 40-65) the incidence of hearing impairment is predicted accurately by interpolation of the relevant prevalence figures, and runs at about 1.8% per annum for 25+ dBHL bilateral hearing impairments. However, the actual rate of deterioration does seem to be influenced by age, those over 55 showing a high rate of up to 9 dB/decade against 3 dB/decade for those under 55. This implies that study over a much longer time is required to find a more exact form for the relationship between age and the rate of deterioration of hearing impairments.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Aging, Denmark, Incidence, Auditory Threshold, Middle Aged, Presbycusis, United Kingdom, Audiometry, Hearing, Cohort Effect, Humans, Female, Longitudinal Studies, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    63
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
63
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?