
pmid: 7211329
Paradoxically, measurements of the loudness of tinnitus indicate that the noise is not a very loud one, yet many persons experiencing it report severe distress. It has been suggested that either loudness has not been measured correctly or that some other factor such as recruitment may be involved. These aspects were investigated, with the following results: (1) the loudness levels obtained for two methods of measuring the loudness of tinnitus differed significantly with the proposed method yielding measures of greater magnitude without exception; (2) recruitment was evidenced for all subjects. On the basis of the results the following conclusions seem justified: (1) the loudness of tinnitus may be more intense than previously reported; (2) the proposed method for measuring the loudness of tinnitus appears to be a more valid measurement than the traditional method.
Adult, Male, Tinnitus, Loudness Perception, Recruitment Detection, Audiologic, Humans
Adult, Male, Tinnitus, Loudness Perception, Recruitment Detection, Audiologic, Humans
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 108 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
