<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 7610775
The purpose of this study was to evaluate a method for computer-assisted image processing to assess quantitatively fractional bone volume in sections of bone biopsies (part I). A second purpose was to apply this method in an experimental study to determine bone loss by measuring fractional bone area in sections of calvarial bone of gastrectomized rats and to compare this with a control group. Stained paraffin sections of skull bone of young rabbits (part I) and rats (part II) were examined. The histologic sections were placed on a microscope. A video camera was connected to the microscope, and the image transferred to a display monitor connected to a PC with dedicated software, performing the measurements. In the first part of the study tests of the reproducibility of the method were performed. The influence of factors such as external illumination and light intensity in the microscope was evaluated by measuring the same area several times at different times (= different illumination) and at different microscope light intensity levels. The automatic method was compared with a manual method, using a Merz grid but automatically calculated. The difference between the means of the manual and automatic measurements was determined with the paired t test. In the second part of the study the unpaired t test was used to determine the differences between the control group and experimental group, both for the manually and the automatically measured values.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Microscopy, Video, Biopsy, Skull, Reproducibility of Results, Microtomy, Rats, Bone Density, Gastrectomy, Photogrammetry, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Animals, Rabbits, Bone Resorption
Microscopy, Video, Biopsy, Skull, Reproducibility of Results, Microtomy, Rats, Bone Density, Gastrectomy, Photogrammetry, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Animals, Rabbits, Bone Resorption
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |