
The rise of algorithmic pricing has transformed perfect price discrimination from a theoretical concept into a real possibility. Through self-learning pricing algorithms, a strategy can be developed that approximates consumers’ reservation prices with ever-improving accuracy. This paper analyzes algorithmic pricing from a law and economics perspective to identify the efficiency and equity effects that the practice could cause and determine to which extent it is regulated under the current legal framework. This paper finds that under competitive market conditions, algorithmic pricing could be welcomed from an efficiency perspective, but from an equity and ethical perspective serious concerns need to be raised. If these concerns are to be taken seriously, the legal framework provides only a partially functional approach to address algorithmic pricing. Additional appropriate remedies are, therefore, needed to protect consumers adequately and effectively against exploitation that reduces their welfare.
Algorithmic Pricing, Consumer Protection, Consumer Welfare, Law and Economics, Personalization, K, Law
Algorithmic Pricing, Consumer Protection, Consumer Welfare, Law and Economics, Personalization, K, Law
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
