
<p>This study compares the performance of EGARCH-X and EGARCH-CJ models in forecasting financial market volatility using daily TOPIX data (2004–2011). Model parameters were estimated using an efficient Bayesian MCMC framework. The results indicate that the EGARCH-CJ model, which decomposes volatility into continuous and jump components, provides a superior in-sample fit. More importantly, in out-of-sample forecasting, the EGARCH-CJ model demonstrates significantly better accuracy for medium- and long-term horizons (e.g., MSE reductions up to 30% at the 5-day horizon, with significant Diebold-Mariano statistics). In contrast, the standard EGARCH model remains more effective for short-term forecasts. These findings underscore the importance of explicitly modeling jump dynamics for medium-term risk management in the Japanese stock market, offering valuable insights for financial modelers and risk managers.</p>
Adaptive Random Walk Metropolis; Continuous and Jump; EGARCH; Realized Volatility
Adaptive Random Walk Metropolis; Continuous and Jump; EGARCH; Realized Volatility
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
