
ABSTRAKDefinisi adil dan tidak adil sangat relatif, tergantung dari sisi mana kitamelihatnya. Jika ditinjau dari sisi pihak yang menang atau dimenangkan, putusanhukum selalu adil, sementara sebaliknya dari sisi pihak yang kalah ataudikalahkan, putusan hukum selalu tidak adil. Penelitian dilaksanakan melaluimetode studi kepustakaan yaitu pendekatan normatif empirik yangmenggabungkan data daripada bahan hukum primer berupa regulasi yang adadengan kejadian-kejadian hukum mengandung tuntutan keadilan, istilah undangundang menandakan norma-norma yang defacto digunakan untuk memenuhituntutan tersebut, entah tertulis atau tidak tertulis.Kata Kunci: Keadilan, Penegakan, Hukum
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
