Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Forum for Linguistic...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Forum for Linguistic Studies
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Cross-Linguistic Influence: Linguistic Variables or Acquisitional Preferences?

Authors: Sarp Erkir; Hussein Abushaaban; null Ali Ata Alkhaldi; null Rashad Faleh Alhasan;

Cross-Linguistic Influence: Linguistic Variables or Acquisitional Preferences?

Abstract

Cross-linguistic influence (CLI) remains a central focus in second language acquisition (SLA), particularly in understanding how first language (L1) conceptual structures shape the perception and acquisition of second language (L2) features. Traditional models of SLA typically emphasize structural mismatches and the frequency of exposure, but often overlook the role of learner agency in conceptual restructuring. This study introduces the concept of acquisitional preferences, which refers to the idea that learners selectively attend to, retain, or overlook certain conceptual features in the L2, based on internalized priorities shaped by cognitive economy, communicative value, or perceived relevance. Synthesizing findings across studies of lexical, grammatical, and conceptual transfer, this theory-building review identifies consistent patterns and theoretical gaps in how conceptual transfer interacts with learner-driven selectivity. The findings of this study suggest that traditional linguistic variables – such as proficiency and input frequency – alone are insufficient to explain L2 conceptual restructuring fully. This study proposes a framework of acquisitional preferences that helps account for persistent inconsistencies in SLA, particularly in cases where learners resist restructuring despite substantial exposure. This model positions learners as active participants in shaping their acquisition pathways and offers a foundation for future empirical research using qualitative methods. Ultimately, it supports the development of more nuanced theories of cross-linguistic influence and cognitive adaptation in SLA.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
hybrid