
This paper is a continuation of our previous works on geometric similarity measures between Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy sets (A-IFSs for short). We consider some traps of the straightforward approach in the case of A-ISs while similarity is understood as a dual concept of a distance. The difficulties are a result of, first, the symmetry of the three terms (the membership, nonmembership and hesitation margin) in an A-IFS element description, and second, of an important role played by those three terms in the definition of the complement of the A-IFS which should be taken into account in the similarity measures.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
