
The article contributes to scholarly conversations around the global prestige and appropriation of texts and forms, by considering some implications of the role of “Achebe” as an exemplary author figure in the formation and reproduction of Africa’s novelistic canon. I begin to propose new categories for critical engagement with “the African novel”, via rereading of The Arrow of God alongside Dominic Mulaisho’s 1971 The Tongue of the Dumb. Written “after Achebe” and revered for being the first Zambian novel to reach global markets, Mulaisho’s novel has also been disparaged for not living up to the literary standards set by the master texts of African realism. I problematize the centre-periphery relations in “the African republic of letters” and Mulaisho’s ambivalent positioning within it, by outlining certain key literary- historical processes in South-eastern Africa before the fall of Apartheid and by interrogating the critical reception of his novel, which emerged out of those circumstances. While it is true that The Tongue of the Dumb appropriates certain elements of Achebean realism, I contend that it should more properly be read as part of a related but distinct local realist tradition based on Bakhtinian adventure time. The article argues for broadening the spectrum of critical approaches to the reading and circulation of Africa’s fictions, and against detracting from Achebe’s literary achievement by turning it into a discursive tool for effacing the continent’s non- globalised literary production.
900, 800
900, 800
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
