
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>pmid: 31036124
Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement is an effective and most frequently used surgical method in the treatment of hydrocephalus, but the mechanical and infective complications are often seen after this surgical procedure. Bowel perforation after VPS surgery is rarely seen complication that is reported ranging between 0.1% and 0.7% in the literature. We report a case of 10-month baby who was shunted at day three of her life and has presented to us with protruding distal end of the ventricular catheter through anus. Mechanism of migration of VPS is unclarified yet; nevertheless, children with myelomeningocele have weakness of the bowel muscles, which probably makes it more sensitive for perforation. Additionally, sharp and stiff end of the VPS, use of trocar by some surgeons, chronic irritation by the shunt, previous surgery, infection and silicone allergy are other possible reasons of bowel perforation. Peritonitis and ventriculitis have a high morbidity and mortality that may occur after VPS-related bowel perforations; hence, it should be managed rapidly and aggressively to reduce morbidity and mortality.
Catheters, Indwelling, Treatment Outcome, Foreign-Body Migration, Intestinal Perforation, Anal Canal, Humans, Infant, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt, Hydrocephalus
Catheters, Indwelling, Treatment Outcome, Foreign-Body Migration, Intestinal Perforation, Anal Canal, Humans, Infant, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt, Hydrocephalus
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
