Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ EFSA Journalarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
EFSA Journal
Article . 2012 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley TDM
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
EFSA Journal
Article
License: CC BY ND
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
EFSA Journal
Article . 2012
Data sources: DOAJ
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of health claims related to a combination of Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I‐1720 and Lactobacillus helveticus CNCM I‐1722 and defence against pathogenic gastro‐intestinal microorganisms (ID 939, further assessment) pursuant to Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006

Authors: EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA);

Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of health claims related to a combination of Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I‐1720 and Lactobacillus helveticus CNCM I‐1722 and defence against pathogenic gastro‐intestinal microorganisms (ID 939, further assessment) pursuant to Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006

Abstract

Abstract Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies was asked to provide a scientific opinion on a health claim related to a combination of Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I‐1720 and Lactobacillus helveticus CNCM I‐1722 and defence against pathogenic gastro‐intestinal microorganisms. The food constituent that is the subject of the health claim, a combination of Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I‐1720 and Lactobacillus helveticus CNCM I‐1722, is sufficiently characterised. The claimed effect, defence against pathogenic gastro‐intestinal microorganisms, is a beneficial physiological effect. The proposed target population is the general population. No human intervention studies were provided from which conclusions could be drawn for the scientific substantiation of the claim. On the basis of the data provided, the Panel concludes that a cause and effect relationship has not been established between the consumption of a combination of Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I‐1720 and Lactobacillus helveticus CNCM I‐1722 and defence against pathogenic gastro‐intestinal microorganisms.

Keywords

gastro‐intestinal pathogens, health claims, Nutrition. Foods and food supply, Chemical technology, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, CNCM I‐1722, TX341-641, TP1-1185, CNCM I‐1720, Lactobacillus helveticus

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold