
doi: 10.26899/inciss.70
The article deals with the comparison of melodic, temporal and dynamic variation of concession clauses with two or more syntagms in English and Azerbaijani. The research is based on the comparative-typological and experimental-phonetic methods; hence both of the languages belong to different language families and different language systems. A lot of examples from both languages have been chosen to carry out an experiment. Here, mainly, sentences with two-syntagms and three-syntagms have been chosen, depending on the purpose of the research. When the results of experiment became apparent, the part of the material belonging to English has been compared with the part that belongs to Azerbaijani. For this purpose, PRAAT computer program has been used
Varyasyon;İmtiyaz;Melodik;Dinamik;Zamansal;Akustik;Parametreler;Tonlama;İletişim., variation;concession;melodic;dynamic;temporal;acoustic;parameters;intonation;communication
Varyasyon;İmtiyaz;Melodik;Dinamik;Zamansal;Akustik;Parametreler;Tonlama;İletişim., variation;concession;melodic;dynamic;temporal;acoustic;parameters;intonation;communication
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
