Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Jurnal Ilmu Pangan d...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Jurnal Ilmu Pangan dan Hasil Pertanian
Article . 2026 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Utilization of Canna Edulis (Ganyong) Starch as an Edible Coating for Tomato Fruits

Authors: null Nadya Novianti Dwi Putri; Mhd Andry Kurniawan; Chandra Gunawan; Jeany Ristia; Nur Hasnah AR; Vivin Jenika Putri; Anania Rahmah; +3 Authors

Utilization of Canna Edulis (Ganyong) Starch as an Edible Coating for Tomato Fruits

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of canna (ganyong, Canna edulis Ker.) starch-based edible coating on the postharvest quality of tomatoes and to determine the optimal starch concentration for shelf-life extension. The novelty of this research lies in the application of ganyong starch—a locally underutilized Indonesian tuberous crop with high amylose content (32.53%)—as a functional edible coating matrix. The study employed a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with five treatment levels (P0: control/no coating; P1: 1% w/v; P2: 1.5% w/v; P3: 2% w/v; P4: 2.5% w/v ganyong starch) and three replications, yielding 15 experimental units each consisting of five uniform tomato fruits (75 fruits total). Prior to ANOVA, data normality was verified using the Shapiro–Wilk test and variance homogeneity was confirmed using Levene's test. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan's New Multiple Range Test (DNMRT) at the 5% significance level was applied independently at each observation day (days 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20). Results demonstrated that the 2.5% w/v ganyong starch coating (P4) was the most effective treatment, significantly reducing weight loss (12.41%), maintaining firmness (4.16 kgf/cm²), stabilizing pH within the physiological range (4.00), and preserving vitamin C content (4.40 mg/100 g) relative to the uncoated control. Hedonic evaluation (30 panelists) gave the 2.5% coating the highest acceptance scores for firmness (3.13, "somewhat like") and color (3.00, "somewhat like").

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold