
doi: 10.26728/ideas.285
Three questions were developed in accordance with the subject and purpose of the study. Are opposing attitudes andcriticisms common among early millennial managers toward millennial employees? Is it common among early millennialmanagers to dislike being called millennials or to refuse to be millennials? Is it common among early millennial managersto tend to claim that they have qualities similar to those of the previous generation? Through the purposive samplingtechnique, a sample of 61 managers, born in 1982 and 1983, was determined. One-on-one interviews were conductedwith the managers. The findings of the study revealed that 1- Opposing attitudes (criticisms) were common among earlymillennial managers toward millennial employees, 2- It was common among early millennial managers to dislike beingcalled millennials or to refuse to be millennials, 3- It was common among early millennial managers to tend to claim thatthey had managerial qualities similar to those of the previous generation; and therefore, the study presented a result thatsupported our observations in the beginning.Keywords: Millennial managers, millennial employees, management, generation, early millennials
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
