
Charging for the guarantee for creditors through the agency of mortgage right, which is based on the provisions of Law No. 4 of 1996 on Mortgage Right, has advantages where the first holder of mortgage right has the right to sell the object of mortgage right on its own power or commonly known as parate execution. However in practice, parate execution can not be carried out in line with expectations and the ideals of the establishment of these legislation. As aresult, the creditors does not get easy, legal certainty, and fairness to perform parate execution of security object. This is because parate execution meant in Law No. 4 of 1996 on Mortgage Right, construed as a substitute for hypotik grosse deed, not based on the promise to sell on its own power or “beding van eigenmactig verkoop”. Above this, required reconstruction parate execution of mortgage right, so that later can ensure easy, legal certainty, and especially givesfairness to creditors.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
