Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Comparación de métodos de análisis de sentimientos en comunidades de habla hispana

Authors: Luis Gabriel Moreno Sandoval; Alexandra Pomares Quimbaya; Camilo Eduardo Cruz Gutiérrez; Johan Ferney García Pachón; David Felipe Vanegas Ramírez;

Comparación de métodos de análisis de sentimientos en comunidades de habla hispana

Abstract

Uno de los fenómenos de estudio que ha motivado a sociólogos, antropólogos, psicólogos y, en general, a investigadores interesados en las interacciones humanas y los alcances de la comunicación lo constituye el Análisis de Subjetividad Colectiva. Las redes sociales son actualmente la principal plataforma para “escuchar” modos de pensar, actuar y sentir (PAS) entre usuarios en la Web con una infinidad de retos computacionales para determinar información útil. Por ello, analizar el sentimiento como un aspecto del lenguaje usado para expresar los estados mentales y emocionales o “estados privados”, que no pueden ser directamente observados, representa un aporte significativo para analizar la subjetividad colectiva. El presente artículo compara el desempeño de modelos de aprendizaje de máquina clásico, aprendizaje profundo y modelos basados en lexicones con el fin de establecer una metodología para analizar los PAS de las comunidades de habla hispana que puedan contribuir al análisis de subjetividad colectiva. Con este propósito, se utiliza un corpus de Twitter proveniente de la competencia TASS2019 para el idioma español. El enfoque de aprendizaje profundo obtuvo los mejores desempeños con los artículos de los principales periódicos en los 32 departamentos de Colombia.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!