Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ UNSWorksarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
UNSWorks
Doctoral thesis . 2018
License: CC BY NC ND
https://dx.doi.org/10.26190/un...
Doctoral thesis . 2018
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Distribution and market share for different dimensions of product assortment

Authors: Shen, Yutian;

Distribution and market share for different dimensions of product assortment

Abstract

Practitioners and analysts widely consider distribution to be a critical element in marketing management. A customer can access a specific product only if it is available at a retailer. Apart from acting as a gatekeeper between a manufacturer and end-users, distribution and in-store availability significantly affect consumers’ choice decisions, manufacturers’ market share outcomes, and retailers’ assortment decisions. To better understand the role of distribution and in-store availability from both demand and supply perspectives, the objective of this thesis is to address three research questions: How, given consumer preferences and shopping patterns across multiple stores and different levels of in-store product assortments, does the realised availability of products to consumers affect manufacturers’ market share outcomes? What is the dynamic relationship between distribution coverage and market share for FMCGs (fast-moving consumer goods) at the SKU (stock keeping unit) level? How does the branded variants strategy used by a FMCG manufacturer affect retailers’ stocking decisions and the corresponding distribution coverage in the market and the typical depth of assortment a retailer stocks for a given brand? This thesis uses different methods in addressing three research questions with a dataset from Information Resources Inc. (IRI). The first essay combines a macro model of multibrand choice with a realised heterogeneous store choice-based availability model. The second essay examines an empirical generalisation with a structural vector autoregression model to capture the effects on distribution and market share of both baseline assortments and historical market performance. The third essay uses a game theoretic model to reveal the optimal degree for a branded variants strategy and then empirically tests a moderated mediation model. This work contributes to existing knowledge by improving the choice model approach used to understand the relationship between distribution and market share with a refined measure of distribution to account for purchase occasion-specific availability across different retailers; by generalising the shapes of the longitudinal effect of distribution on market share at the SKU level across several contexts; and finally by demonstrating the optimal degree for a branded variants strategy in a retail duopoly scenario and empirically testing retailers’ stocking and assortment responses to this strategy.

Country
Australia
Related Organizations
Keywords

330, 650

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green