Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ UNSWorksarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
UNSWorks
Doctoral thesis . 2020
License: CC BY NC ND
https://dx.doi.org/10.26190/un...
Doctoral thesis . 2020
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Optimising the diagnosis of posterior circulation stroke

Authors: Calic, Zeljka;

Optimising the diagnosis of posterior circulation stroke

Abstract

The aim of this thesis was to optimise the diagnosis of posterior circulation stroke (PCS), a less common stroke subtype with potentially devastating consequences to those patients with delayed or missed diagnosis. The first study investigated the frequency of delayed presentation and misdiagnosis of cerebellar infarction (CBI) in 115 consecutive patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) of a large comprehensive stroke centre. Most patients tended to present late (>4.5h, p=0.05). 34% were misdiagnosed, most commonly as having a benign peripheral vestibular disorder. Nausea and vomiting, the absence of neurological signs and isolated CBI significantly correlated with misdiagnosis (p<0.05). Only 10% of patients received acute intravenous thrombolysis and/or endovascular therapy. The study confirmed the need for an improved diagnostic paradigm to differentiate peripheral causes of dizziness and vertigo from PCS. The second study involving the same prospectively collected cohort demonstrated that patients with small CBI (<2cm, 33/108 [31%]) presented with fewer symptoms and signs compared to large CBI. Vertebrobasilar disease was the presumed aetiology in 37% of patients. Small CBI patients were less likely to have large vessel atheromatous vertebrobasilar disease. Cardioembolism affected 37% of patients, irrespective of CBI size or topography. The presence of moderate-severe small vessel white matter disease correlated with 3-month functional dependence, particularly in large CBI. The findings reinforced the importance of comprehensive vascular risk factor assessment including extensive cardioembolic work-up in patients with small CBI. The third study examined the diagnostic utility of non-invasive, quantitative vestibular function tests in differentiating between central (PCS) and peripheral (vestibular neuritis [VN]) causes of acute vestibular syndrome (AVS). Semicircular canal and otolith function tests were undertaken within 14 days of symptom onset in 22 patients with PCS and 22 with VN. Findings were compared to 40 normal controls. The study demonstrated that the vestibulo-ocular reflex gain and saccade characteristics obtained from video Head Impulse Testing (vHIT) were the most useful in separating VN and PCS. Vestibular function testing was also helpful in separating PCS from normal controls. These findings suggest that performing vHIT in AVS patients may help identification of the aetiology of AVS in emergency settings.

Country
Australia
Related Organizations
Keywords

Posterior circulation stroke, 616, Misdiagnosis, 610, Vestibular function tests

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green