Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ UNSWorksarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
UNSWorks
Doctoral thesis . 2018
License: CC BY NC ND
https://dx.doi.org/10.26190/un...
Doctoral thesis . 2018
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Longwall Top Coal Caving Mechanism and Cavability Assessment

Authors: Le, Tien Dung;

Longwall Top Coal Caving Mechanism and Cavability Assessment

Abstract

Longwall Top Coal Caving (LTCC) is considered one of the most efficient methods for mining thick coal seams. Compared to other thick seam mining methods, LTCC can offer significantly reduced operational costs, high production and resource recovery rates, and improve mine safety. The successful technical application of LTCC is controlled by the understanding of geotechnical mechanisms associated with its operation (LTCC mechanisms) and by the reliable prediction of top coal cavability. However, current understanding of LTCC mechanisms is limited, thus restricting the validity of existing top coal cavability assessment criteria. The research contains investigations into the applicability evaluation of LTCC. The main objectives were (1) the development of an advanced numerical modelling approach for studying LTCC mechanisms; (2) the improvement of understanding of major LTCC mechanisms; (3) the evaluation of parameters that have important impacts on top coal cavability; and (4) the development of an advanced criterion for assessing top coal cavability. Numerical modelling method was used as the main tool for investigating LTCC mechanisms and evaluating critical parameters. Based on model results, statistical analysis and back analysis of LTCC practices were implemented in developing the proposed cavability assessment criterion. The most significant results of this research included (1) an advanced numerical modelling approach for studying LTCC problems; (2) improved understanding of stress redistribution, material failure, strata instability and roof strata movement associated with LTCC operation; and (3) an advanced assessment criterion for top coal cavability. The advanced numerical modelling approach is, for the first time, successful in incorporating plastic material into a discontinuum code (UDEC) for modelling LTCC problems. This approach is capable of explicitly representing caving, adequately capturing rock strength disintegration and sufficiently incorporating roof strata movement. The improved understanding of LTCC mechanisms assists engineers in better identifying and managing potential LTCC-associated geotechnical risks. The advanced cavability assessment criterion provides engineers with a more comprehensive and reliable tool to predict top coal cavability. The advanced criterion combined with improved understanding can be used in the coal industry for efficiently evaluating LTCC applicability at the feasibility stage of a new mining project.

Country
Australia
Related Organizations
Keywords

Numerical modelling, Longwall Top Coal Caving, Caving mechanism, 600, Top coal cavability, 620

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green