Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ UNSWorksarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
UNSWorks
Doctoral thesis . 2014
License: CC BY NC ND
https://dx.doi.org/10.26190/un...
Doctoral thesis . 2014
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Datacite
DBLP
Doctoral thesis
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Trust and Privacy in Social Participatory Sensing

Authors: Amintoosi, Haleh;

Trust and Privacy in Social Participatory Sensing

Abstract

Advances in the sensing capabilities of smartphones have resulted in the emergence of participatory sensing. In participatory sensing, ordinary citizens are recruited to collect sensor data from nearby environments which are then analysed to provide useful information. The information credibility is predominantly dependent on sufficient participation. There are however, various costs associated with contributing data including time, phone battery and bandwidth consumption and potential exposure to privacy threats. These issues may dissuade participants from contributing, thus decreasing the data quality. The integration of social networks with participatory sensing, referred to as social participatory sensing is a potential solution since it provides access to social network members as participants. This integration however, raises new challenges. First, is the potential sparseness of the requester's friendship graph which affects the ability to recruit sufficient contributors. Second, is the identification of well-suited participants who can fulfil the task's requirements. Third, is assessing the trustworthiness of provided contributions. In this thesis, we propose an innovative framework comprising novel strategies that address the aforementioned issues. We first present a recruitment scheme that addresses the participation sufficiency issue by utilising friendship relations to provide access to adequate participants. The scheme also identifies credible communication paths to preserve the integrity and privacy of messages. Next, we design a participant selection scheme to select well-suited participants from a wider pool. Our scheme also prevents collusion among the selected group. Finally, we present a trust assessment scheme for comprehensive trust evaluation encompassing all personal and social influential parameters. The trust scores are then used to update the participants' reputations. The proposed ideas have been experimentally validated on real-world datasets. Results show that our framework is able to effectively address the participant sufficiency by recruiting the required participants with twice the suitability as that achieved by comparable methods. Moreover, it can accurately detect 83% of possible collusion instances. Our framework is also successful in increasing the overall trust to 90% which is 15% greater than that achieved by compared methods. To sum up, our proposed framework is successful in comprehensively addressing the challenges of social participatory sensing in an application-agnostic manner.

Country
Australia
Related Organizations
Keywords

330, Privacy, Trust, Social participatory sensing, 004

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green