Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Harmonisation of Accounting Standards: how useful is it for multi-listed companies?

Authors: BIR, POONAM;

Harmonisation of Accounting Standards: how useful is it for multi-listed companies?

Abstract

This thesis comprises two research studies investigating two of the proposed benefits of the International Harmonisation Program (IHP) undertaken by the Australian Accounting Standards Board (MSB) from 1996 to 2002. The IHP aimed to harmonise Australian accounting standards with International Accounting Standards' (IASs). The motivation for these studies is the lack of empirical evidence on the impact of harmonisation on multi-listed companies and the impact generally of the IHP. Besides investors, multi-listed companies are expected to benefit most from harmonisation. Harmonisation of accounting standards is expected to reduce the cost of comparing alternative sets of financial information for investors leading to lower cost of capital for multi-listed companies (Howieson (1998)). It is also expected to eliminate or reduce the need for additional reporting requirements and, therefore, reduce the financial reporting and operating costs of multi-listed companies (Brown and Clinch (1998)). Prior literature has suggested that International Accounting Standards are closer to US GMP than any other GMP. This implies that harmonisation of Australian accounting standards with JASs under the !HP has brought Australian GMP closer to US GMP. This thesis investigated the benefits of IHP to Australian companies listed on US stock exchanges [...]

Related Organizations
Keywords

FOS: Economics and business, Accounting theory and standards, 150101 Accounting Theory and Standards

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!