
doi: 10.26108/9vmx-7129
The widely used concept of "Quality of Working Life" involves people in organizations (management, workers and union representatives) working together toward outcomes which are seen to be mutually beneficial to all. "Quality of Working Life" relates not only to the profitability, growth, survival of the organization, and a good labour-management relationship, but also to the quality of life of an individual. On the basis of two case studies, it is concluded that a "Quality of Working Life" program is necessary to meet the needs of both the social system and the economic system of an organization. Therefore, the consultative, participative and problem-solving framework of QWL is not only good for employees and employers, but also for the continued well-being of society. Only when employees and employers together take control of their work and their working environment, will both the goals of improving quality of working life and organizational effectiveness be achieved. In other words, all parties to QWL programs stand to gain because we will not pursue one goal (productivity) at the cost of the other (the quality of life at work) or vice versa.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
