Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

A biological approach to auditory signal processing

Authors: Jordan, Mark;

A biological approach to auditory signal processing

Abstract

For speech recognition applications the ultimate goal is to achieve human-like performance. State of the art signal processing algorithms for speech recognition fall considerably short of this goal. I have attempted to reverse engineer peripheral regions of the mammalian auditory system to gain some insight into how our brains might process speech. I constructed a biologically based temporal signal processing model of the auditory periphery consisting of the following sub-models (a) generic spiking neuron; (b) middle ear; (c) cochlea; (d) inner hair cell; (e) spiral ganglion cell; (f) bushy cell; (g) stellate cell; (h) octopus cell; (1) medial superior olive multipolar cell. Individually, the models produced behaviours similar to their biological counterparts. As a whole, the model was able to demonstrate how the missing fundamental of a complex Signal could be perceived, despite its absence from the spectrum. My work has led me to conclude that (a) the peripheral auditory system appears to operate primarily as a wideband temporal processor; (b) the dorsal cochlear nucleus appears to be involved in compensating for pinna position; (c) the connectivity of octopus cells is entirely consistent with their suspected role as onset detectors; (d) the ventral cochlear nucleus appears to have specialised time, intensity, and startle output pathways; (e) the laminar architecture of auditory nuclei is likely to play an important functional role; (f) the spatial cross correlation theory of pitch perception [Loeb, White and Merzenich, Biol. Cyber. 47, 149-163 (1983)] may need further extension to account for the phase independence of pitch.

Country
New Zealand
Related Organizations
Keywords

612

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!