Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

A biclustering approach for detecting cheating in educational assessments

Authors: Lee, Hyeryung;

A biclustering approach for detecting cheating in educational assessments

Abstract

Two comprehensive studies were conducted to evaluate this approach. In the first study, I applied biclustering to real-world assessment data consisting of dichotomously scored multiple-choice items and demonstrated the method’s superior performance over traditional approaches. Analyses further validated its robustness through simulations modeling a variety of realistic cheating scenarios. To enhance realism, the simulations also incorporated additional aberrant responses, such as rapid guessing due to time constraints and low motivation. In the second study, I extended the biclustering method to real-time cheating detection using mixed-format assessments, including dichotomous, polytomous, and multi-part items. This real-time application incorporated enhanced statistical significance testing to maintain low false positive rates and revealed strong detection performance across varying conditions and item types, including timestamp-based detection across different cheating scenarios.

Cheating detection in educational assessments remains a challenging issue, complicated by increasingly sophisticated cheating strategies and the rise of remote testing environments. In this dissertation, I introduce a novel biclustering approach for detecting cheating by simultaneously identifying groups of examinees and test items exhibiting suspicious response patterns. This biclustering method enables comprehensive detection of cheating behaviors by analyzing response accuracy, response time, and answer choices.

Results across both studies underscore the biclustering approach’s adaptability, computational efficiency, and precision, making it a valuable tool for maintaining test integrity in both post-exam analysis and real-time applications. I conclude by discussing practical implications, limitations, and directions for future research.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!