Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Cloze probability norms for a dual-sentence prediction paradigm

Authors: Van Hoveln, Monica;

Cloze probability norms for a dual-sentence prediction paradigm

Abstract

A central component of sentence comprehension is prediction in which listeners and readers anticipate impending words. This prediction takes place as the sentence unfolds, indicating an incremental view of sentence processing based heavily upon prediction (Tyler & Marslen-Wilson, 1977). Additionally, the brain organizes semantic information such that words whose referents share semantic features are partially activated (McRae et al., 1997). Therefore, if we predict a word incorrectly, our language processing system is better equipped to deal with the unpredicted word if it shares features with the predicted word (Federmeier & Kutas, 1999). This is often tested by using high-constraint sentences with high cloze probability. However, the common single sentence paradigm does not allow for multiple experiments or better understanding prediction of semantically related words as there are very few plausible endings to a single sentence with high contextual constraint. A two-sentence design with a heavily contextual first sentence and a carrier phrase that can feasibly end with any number of words opens the door for researchers to add many different plausible sentence endings, thereby adding more adaptability into the experimental design while maintaining a high cloze probability.

The aim of the present study was to extend this contribution by expanding the existing database of high-constraint, high cloze probability sentences to designs with two sentences, and is especially useful for experiments that examine featural similarity in greater depth. In total, 120 high-constraint sentences were validated and normed.

Keywords

public abstract

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!